PETITION: Labour politician Ricky Jones found NOT guilty! We demand a RETRIAL! Labour is NOT above the law!

105,057 Signatures
Goal: 100,000 Signatures

ADDRESSED TO: THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR JUSTICE

The acquittal of Labour councillor Ricky Jones for 'encouraging violence' by calling for the throats of patriots to be slit is outrageous and demands a retrial to ensure fair prosecution.

If a patriot had made a similar call to action against any group, they would face swift conviction and imprisonment, as seen in Lucy Connolly's 31-month sentence for 'inciting racial hatred'.

Labour politicians cannot be above the law!

Jones's inflammatory remarks, made publicly through a microphone at a volatile anti-racism rally, were excused despite their clear potential to incite violence, exposing a biased justice system that favours left-wing / Islamic ideologies.

Critics have rightly called the verdict 'perverse' and evidence of 'two-tier justice', fuelling public outrage over this double standard.

We have launched a petition to demand a retrial and a fair prosecution to restore trust in equal justice under the law.

Once you have signed the petition below, be sure to share it using the social media buttons.

Please add your name to the petition below:

Add your name below

I, the undersigned, add my name to the petition:

SECURE FORM

COMMENTS

  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:57 +0100
    If the jury consisted of 9 Muslims and 3 non Muslims, it cannot be a fair trial.
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:51 +0100
    This is a gross miscarriage of justice,a mother triggered by murders at Southport ,imprisoned,but a high profile councillor seen by millions gets off
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:39 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:23 +0100
    If a post is worth a 2years+ jail term then what he did intentionally in that atmosphere must be worth at least a 3year term.
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:13 +0100
    Trial was a farce
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:09 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:04 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:06:00 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:04:10 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:04:02 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:03:45 +0100
    Nick him
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:03:39 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:02:52 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:02:43 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:02:01 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:01:28 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:00:55 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:00:53 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:00:20 +0100
    This was a despicable verdict
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:00:13 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 20:00:07 +0100
    He was seen, heard and on video doing the deed! How can he not be guilty?
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:59:59 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:59:21 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:58:47 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:58:22 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:58:18 +0100
    Absolutely no excuse for this individual not to be in prison.
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:58:14 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:57:46 +0100
    This is corruption
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:57:25 +0100
  • signed 2025-08-16 19:56:50 +0100